ENTSOG GRIP BEMIP 2014-2023 / Main Report

F I N L A N D

Imatra

27.82 mcm/d

90

Hameenlinna

23.09

Lappeenranta Kouvola

Lahti

Mantsala

Vyborg

Turku

Porvoo

Kotka

Lohja

Vousaari

Primorsk Baltic LNG

HELSINKI

Espoo

4.73

76.2 bar

G u l f o f F i n l a n d

Finngulf

Hanko

St. Petersburg

0

bar 21.0 38.9

0

bar 80.0 37.9

Narva

4.73

TALLINN

8.44 mcm/d

BALTIC CONNECTOR

Paldiski

21.4 bar

E S T O N I A

bar 50.0 25.0

Novgorod

9.98

3.19

39.0 bar

Pärnu

Karksi

Pskov

55

102

Värska

31.5 bar

G u l f o f R i g a

Misso

Izborsk

N O RD STREAM

91

4.8

Korneti

12.6 mcm/d

R U S S I A

50.0 bar

30.57

Inčukalns UGS

RĪGA lecava

L AT V I A

Rēzekne

Liepāja

48.0 bar

56

Kieménai

0

Daugavpils

4.25

Śiauliai

17.0 mcm/d

Klaipeda

Klaipeda

Visaginas

L I T H U A N I A

Jurbarkas

7.0 mcm/d

Kaunas

Jauniunai

57

Šakiai

Kotlovka

YA M A L

92

7.0

Kaliningrad

VILNIUS

15.10

4.65

MINSK

B E L A R U S

GI P L

P O L A N D

Tietierowka

93

Figure 3.5: Disruption scenario – gas flow disruption from LNG terminal in Inkoo and possible gas flows in order to minimize gas deficit, 2020 (Legend see page 50)

In case of gas supply disruption from Inkoo LNG terminal in Finland all countries of the East-Baltic region also do not experience any gas shortages, and significant volumes of gas needed for Finland can be delivered from Inčukalns UGS through Balticconector via Estonia.

Baltic Energy Market Interconnection Plan GRIP 2014–2023 | 55