ENTSOG GRIP BEMIP 2014-2023 / Main Report

F I N L A N D

Imatra

27.82 mcm/d

90

Hameenlinna

23.65

Lappeenranta Kouvola

Lahti

Mantsala

Vyborg

Turku

Porvoo

Kotka

Lohja

Vousaari

Primorsk Baltic LNG

HELSINKI

Espoo

4.17

Finngulf

G u l f o f F i n l a n d

Hanko

St. Petersburg

5.86

0

42.9 bar 43.3 bar

Narva

1.69

TALLINN

BALTICCONNECTOR

8.44 mcm/d

Paldiski

42.6 bar

E S T O N I A

Novgorod

4.62

2.13

47.3 bar

Pärnu

Karksi

Pskov

55

102

Värska

46.3 bar

G u l f o f R i g a

Misso

Izborsk

N O RD STREAM

91

0

Korneti

12.6 mcm/d

R U S S I A

50.0 bar

31.35

Inčukalns UGS

RĪGA lecava

L AT V I A

Rēzekne

Liepāja

40.7 bar

56

Kieménai

Daugavpils

4.9

12.0

Śiauliai

17.0 mcm/d

Klaipeda

Klaipeda

Visaginas

L I T H U A N I A

Jurbarkas

7.0 mcm/d

Kaunas

Jauniunai

57

Šakiai

Kotlovka

YA M A L

92

7.0

Kaliningrad

VILNIUS

0

7.1

MINSK

B E L A R U S

GI P L

P O L A N D

Tietierowka

93

Figure 3.4: Disruption scenario – gas flow disruption from Kotlovka and possible gas flows in order to minimize gas deficit, 2020 (Legend see page 50)

In case of gas disruption through Kotlovka gas demand for Lithuania can be fully covered from Klaipeda LNG terminal and Inčukalns UGS. No other country of the East-Baltic region is experiencing any gas deficit as well.

54 |

Baltic Energy Market Interconnection Plan GRIP 2014–2023