ENTSOG TYNDP 2015 - Annex C1 - Country Details

EE (ESTONIA)

Final gas demand The differences between Scenario A and the Scenario B are limited to the annual forecasts, while the figures for the 1-day Design Case and the 14-day Uniform Risk are the same for both scenarios. Power generation  – general methodology The Estonian electricity sector has the peculiarity of having oil shale, and not coal, as the main competing technology for gas-fired power generation. The general methodology has been applied, by substituting oil for coal-fired installed capacities.

ES (SPAIN)

Final gas demand Scenarios A and B have been developed by Enagas, based on different evolutions of GDP (one more optimistic and the other one pessimistic). Power generation  – general methodology Enagas has used different minimum and maximum gas and coal-fired power generation levels for Visions 1 and 3, rather than using installed capacity levels, in order to provide a clearer differentiation of the two ENTSO-E visions.

Power generation  – Scenario by TSO

2015

2020

2025

2030

2035

GWh/d

DAILY PEAK

653.77

893.61

908.09

871.36

821.51

GWh/y

ANNUALLY DEMAND UPPER

160,120

98,531 138,915

157,355

158,063

ANNUALLY DEMAND MEDIUM GWh/y

80,274 109,004

123,493

124,049

125,666

GWh/y

ANNUALLY DEMAND LOWER

56,018

69,147

93,522

102,426

113,339

FI (FINLAND)

Final gas demand The TSO submitted the inputs for the general methodology. No further comments have been reported. Power generation  – general methodology The TSO submitted the inputs for the general methodology. No further comments have been reported.

6 |

Ten Year Network Development Plan 2015 Annex C 1