ENTSOG GRIP BEMIP 2014-2023 / Main Report

F I N L A N D

Imatra

25.68 mcm/d

90

Hameenlinna

25.68

Lappeenranta Kouvola

Lahti

Mantsala

Vyborg

Turku

Porvoo

Kotka

Lohja

Vousaari

Primorsk Baltic LNG

HELSINKI

Espoo

Finngulf

G u l f o f F i n l a n d

Hanko

St. Petersburg

2.2

Narva

BALTICCONNECTOR

TALLINN

6.71 mcm/d

Paldiski

E S T O N I A

-2.51 mcm/d

Novgorod

2.0

Pärnu

Karksi

Pskov

55

102

Värska

G u l f o f R i g a

Misso

Izborsk

N O RD STREAM

91

4.0

Korneti

12.0 mcm/d

R U S S I A

0

-6.0 mcm/d

Inčukalns UGS

RĪGA lecava

L AT V I A

Rēzekne

Liepāja

56

Kieménai

2.0

Daugavpils

5.3

Śiauliai

17.0 mcm/d

Klaipeda

Klaipeda

Visaginas

L I T H U A N I A

Jurbarkas

7.0 mcm/d

Kaunas

Jauniunai

57

Šakiai

Kotlovka

YA M A L

92

7.0

Kaliningrad

VILNIUS

20.7

MINSK

B E L A R U S

GI P L

P O L A N D

Tietierowka

93

Figure 3.2: Disruption scenario – disruption of gas supply from Inčukalns UGS in cold winter day and possible gas flows in order to minimize the deficit of gas, 2015 (Legend see page 50)

52 |

Baltic Energy Market Interconnection Plan GRIP 2014–2023