ENTSOG First Report on Implementation Monitoring and Baseline for Effect Monitoring of the Tariff Network Code

Example for TSO ‘X’

\\ Assumed Imbalance: +10 (2013), +7 (2014), +5 (2015), +4 (2016) \\ Assumed Allowed Revenue: 99 (2013), 101 (2014), 100 (2015) and 102 (2016) \\ ABRR is therefore 7.33% in 2013–15 and 5.28% in 2014–16 \\ SDBRR is therefore 2.52% in 2013–15 and 1.51% in 2014–16 Æ  Both ABRR and SDBRR decrease between 2013 and 2016, which is a good evolution. This example shows the approach followed for each TSO to derive results.

0 5 4 3 2 1 6 7 8 %

TSO 'X'

ABRR

SDBRR

2013 – 15

2014 – 16

Figure 29: application of TAR.1 to fictional TSO ‘X’

Interpretation of TAR.1

\\ For each TSO, a table will show whether the evolution is favourable or not in terms of ABRR and SDBRR, which means whether either or both indicators evolve towards better or more stable revenue recovery. \\ In the figure provided for the above example, the TSO would figure in the ‘positive evolution’ column, since both the absolute ABRR and SDBRR go down.

48 |

TAR NC Implementation and Effect Monitoring Report 2017