ENTSOG BAL NC Monitoring Report 2016
4.2 OVERVIEW TABLE OF DEGREE OF IMPLEMENTATION OF BAL NC
Without covering all the topics and all the details that are available in the report table 5 below displays a selection of information with the aim of providing an overview on the implementation state of BAL NC in countries by 1 October 2016. For more detailed information on the implementation status in the countries, refer to the annexes 4) of this report.
4) Please see also the previous report regarding more details which have not been reported as an update.
Overview table of selected information on implementation by 1 October 2016
Hourly re-nomi- nation cycle, Standard Re- nomination lead
Trade notifica- tions and lead time (30min / 30mins
STSPs (only title/also others/under discussion/ no plans)
Balancing services (in
Information Model (with established forecasting party)
Types of infor- mation provision art. 32 BAL NC (total out of 3)
Daily Imbalance Charge/imple- mented by 1 October 2016
Neutrality arrangements implemented
Trading platform (in place/ foreseen date)
place/foreseen or discussed/ none)
time (≤2hrs) Cluster 2015
Country
Cluster 2015
AT
In place
Only title
None
Yes
30 min
3*
Base case (Third Party)
Yes
No 1)
BE/LU
In place
Only title
None
Yes 2)
30 min
3
Variant 1 (TSO)
Yes
Yes
DE
In place
Also others
In place
Yes
30 min
3*
Variant 2 (DSO)
Yes
Yes
DK
In place
Only title
None
Yes
30 min < x ≤ 2 h 3
Base case (TSO)
Yes
Other mechanism
FR
In place
Also others
None
Yes
30 min
3*
Base case (TSO)
Yes
Yes
HU
In place
Also others
None
Yes
30 min
3*
Variant 1 (Third Party not implemented yet)
Yes
Yes
NL
In place
Also others
None
Yes
30 min
3*
Variant 1 (Third Party)
Yes
Yes
SI
In place
Only title
In place
Yes
30 min < x ≤ 2 h 3
Variant 1 (TSO)
Yes
Yes
UK-GB
In place
Also others
None
Yes
30 min < x ≤ 2 h 3*
Base case (TSO)
Yes
Yes
Cluster 2016
CZ
In place
Only title foreseen (1 July 2016)
In place
Yes
30 min
3
Base case (Third Party)
Yes
Yes partially
ES
In place
Also others
None
Yes
30 min
3*
Base case (Third Party)
Yes
Yes
Table 5: Overview table of selected information on implementation by 1 October 2016
HR
Planned by 1 April 2017
Under discus- sion
In place
Yes
30 min < x ≤ 2 h 3
– (Designation of Third Party in progress)
Under development
No
IT
In place
Only title
foreseen
Yes
30 min
3
Base case (TSO)
Yes
Yes
Yes
PT
Planned
Under discussion
In place
Yes
30 min
3
Variant 2 (TSO)
Yes partially 3)
* One type of information is considered confidential and is provided via secured platform. 1) In Austria in case of a daily imbalance > 24 MWh, balancing actions per balance group are triggered by MAM in the name and on behalf of the BGR. No costs/revenues for the MAM, the BGR pays/receives the market price to/from the VTP. Hourly short imbalanced positions with short Market Area Position and short Carry forward account will be charged by balancing incentive mark-up. Finally, a last line of defence for balancing is to curtail imbalanced balance group, which causes network instability. Those balanc- ing incentive mark-ups generate income, which is accumulated and used to reduce transmission charges in future periods. As the balancing incentive mark-ups were massively reduced since their introduction, the effect in total is small. As the MAM did not take measures for physical balancing, the total sum of the balancing incentive mark-up for 2013 – 2015 was returned to the network users via lower tariffs.
2) At the IP Remich between Germany and Luxemburg the re-nomination lead time on the Luxembourg side is two hours and 15 minutes. The additional time is used by Creos Luxemburg to re-nominate in case suppliers do not fulfil their nominations obligations/ restrictions based on the forecast offtake at this IP. For all other IPs, the standard lead time of 2 hours applies. 3) Portugal has partially implemented the provisions of applicable price. Even though neither a trading platform nor STSPs have yet been implemented, a default rule for derivation of weighted average price is in place, taking into account the trades at the PVB (Spanish Virtual Trading Point). According to the NRA's decision, Mibgás, S.A., operating the Spanish Trading platform at the Spanish VTP (PVB) shall be the future Market Operator in Portugal.
ENTSOG BAL NC Monitoring Report 2016 |
41
Made with FlippingBook