ENTSOG BAL NC Monitoring Report 2016
a) Czech Republic partially imple- mented the provisions for NDM off-takes. In Austria, NDM fore- casts are provided by DAM based on data from DSOs. Bulgaria reported that data for IDM off- takes is provided to NUs only as no NDMs are connected to the transmission system. provisions are implemented due to minor part of the market and no receiving interest from NUs. Reported as not applicable due to no daily and/or non-daily metered off-take points connected to the transmission system, in Slovakia and Greece. b) Sweden reported that no NDM
Variant 1
Base Case Model a)
Variant 2
Under discussion /n/a b)
a) Czech Republic partially implemented the provisions for NDM off-takes. In Austria, NDM forecasts are provided by DAM based on data from DSOs. Bulgaria reported that data for IDM off-takes is provided to NUs only as no NDMs are connected to the transmission system. b) Sweden reported that no NDM provisions are implemented due to minor part of the market and no receiving interest from NUs. Reported as not applicable due to no daily and/or non-daily metered off-take points connected to the transmission system, in Slovakia and Greece. Map 6: Information model chosen by NRA by 1 October 2016
changes and/or updates for IDM and/or NDM offtake points have been provided by three countries (DE, LT and PL). Of the five countries with an implementation deadline by 1 October 2016, three countries (IT, ES and PT) reported the implementation by 1 October 2016. One country (CZ) partially implemented the provisions by 1 July 2016. In Croatia no information model is in place as the decision on it is still in progress.
The majority (19) of countries (AT, BE/LU, BG, CZ, DE, DK, ES, FR, HU, IE, IT, LT, NL, PL 34) , PT, SI, UK-GB and UK-NI) reported having chosen an information model, except six countries in- cluding Estonia (EL, HR, RO, SE and SK) by 1 October 2016. While Portugal finalised the process by applying “Variant 2”, Croatia and Ro- mania responded that it is still in progress. Slo- vakia and Greece repeated as a reason having no non-daily metered off-take points connected to the transmission system.
From those countries with an implementation deadline by 1 October 2015 implementation
Table 4.3 to 4.7 in Annex IV provide additionally an overview of countries per information model.
34) For the Polish TGPS balancing zone the information model provisions are reported as not applicable as it has no non-daily metered off-takes and no DSO is connected to the system.
22 |
ENTSOG BAL NC Monitoring Report 2016
Made with FlippingBook