Baltic Energy Market Interconnection Plan GRIP 2017

5 MODELLING RESULTS

94 5.1 ENTSOG TYNDP Modelling Cases . . . . . . . . . . . . 95 5.2 BEMIP GRIP Additional Cases . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97 5.3 Indicators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100 5.4 Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100 104 6.1 Denmark and Sweden . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105 6.2 Estonia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105 6.3 Finland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106 6.4 Latvia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107 6.5 Lithuania . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108 6.6 Poland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109

6 ANALYSIS OF MODELLING RESULTS BY COUNTRY

7 CONCLUSIONS

110

ABBREVIATIONS

113

COUNTRY CODES (ISO)

114

ASSUMPTIONS

114

LIST OF TABLES

115

LIST OF FIGURES

116

LEGAL DISCLAIMER

119

BEMIP Gas Regional Investment Plan 2017 | 3